25. I. A. Dmitrenko et al., J. Geophys. Res. 114, C06010 (2009).
26. B. Rudels, L. G. Anderson, E. P. Jones, J. Geophys. Res. 101,
27. B. Rudels, P. Jones, U. Schauer, P. Eriksson, Polar Res. 23,
28. M. Steele, T. Boyd, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 103, 10419–10435
29. Y.-D. Lenn et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L05601 (2009).
30. D. Bauch et al., J. Geophys. Res. 114, C05008 (2009).
31. M. Årthun, T. Eldevik, L.-H. Smedsrud, Ø. Skagseth,
R. B. Ingvaldsen, J. Clim. 25, 4736–4743 (2012).
32. L. Rainville, R. A. Woodgate, Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L23604 (2009).
33. M. Reigstad, P. Wassmann, C. W. Riser, S. Øygarden, F. Rey,
J. Mar. Syst. 38, 9–29 (2002).
34. P. Wassmann et al., in The Organic Carbon Cycle in the Arctic
Ocean, R. Stein, R. W. Macdonald, Eds. (Springer-Verlag
Heidelberg-Berlin-New York, 2004), pp. 101–138.
35. I. V. Polyakov et al., J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 2743–2756 (2010).
36. J. Cohen et al., Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).
37. E. C. Carmack et al., J. Geophys. Res. 121, 675–717 (2016).
38. W. Williams, C. E. Carmack, Prog. Oceanogr. 139, 24–41 (2015).
39. B. A. Bluhm, K. N. Kosobokoba, E. C. Carmack, Prog. Oceanogr.
139, 89–121 (2015).
40. M. Yamamoto-Kawai, F. McLaughlin, E. C. Carmack,
J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 6274–6284 (2013).
41. K. M. H. Larsen, C. Gonzalez-Pola, P. Fratantoni,
A. Beszczynska-Möller, S. L. Hughes, Eds., ICES Report on
Ocean Climate 2015. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 331
(International Council for the Exploration of the Sea,
42. K. Aagaard, E. C. Carmack, in The Polar Oceans and Their Role
in Shaping the Global Environment, Geophys. Monogr. Ser.,
vol. 85, O. M. Johannessen, R. D. Muench, J. E. Overland, Eds.
(AGU, Washington, DC, 1994), pp. 5–20.
43. I. V. Polyakov et al., Ecol. Appl. 23, 1745–1764 (2013).
44. A. Proshutinsky, D. Dukhovskoy, M.-L. Timmermans,
R. Krishfield, J. L. Bamber, Phil. Trans. A. 373, 20140160 (2015).
45. R. Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 4570–4575 (2015).
46. L. Padman, T. M. Dillon, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 4769–4782 (1991).
47. M. G. McPhee, T. Kikuchi, J. H. Morison, T. P. Stanton,
Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2274 (2003).
48. A. Sirevaag, I. Fer, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39, 3049–3069 (2009).
49. I. Fer, R. Skogseth, F. Geyer, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 1613–1630
50. I. Fer, Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett. 2, 148–152 (2009).
This study was supported by NSF grants 1203473 and 1249133
(A.V.P., I.V.P., M.B.A., R.R., and V.V.I.), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration grant NA15OAR4310155 (A.V.P., I.V.P.,
M.B.A., R.R., T.M.B., and V.V.I.), Russian Science Foundation grant
14-37-00053, and by the A-TWAIN project, funded by the Arctic
Ocean program at the FRAM-High North Research Centre for
Climate and the Environment. We thank Henriksen Shipping
Service AS, for help with logistics. The mooring recovery and
deployment was a great team effort by all onboard the research
vessels Akademik Fedorov (2013) and Akademik Tryoshnikov
(2015). We thank our colleagues from the Arctic and Antarctic
Research Institute, Russia, particularly V. Vizitov, V. Zaitsev, and
E. Morozova, for their help with cruise preparations. All mooring data
used in this study are available on the web at https://arcticdata.
io/catalog/#view/arctic-data.7792.4. All authors participated in
data processing and preliminary analysis; A.V.P., I.M.A., I.V.P., R.R.,
and V.V.I. carried out statistical analysis of data; R.Kw. provided
sea-ice information and processing; T.K. processed Fram Strait
data; A.S. provided processing and analysis for Svalbard mooring
data; A. Y. analyzed fast-ice thickness data; and T.M.B. worked with
reanalysis data. All authors contributed to interpreting the data
and writing the paper. The authors declare no competing financial
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S6
16 August 2016; accepted 24 March 2017
Published online 6 April 2017
iPTF16geu: A multiply
imaged, gravitationally lensed
type Ia supernova
A. Goobar,1 R. Amanullah,1 S. R. Kulkarni,2 P. E. Nugent,3,4 J. Johansson,5 C. Steidel,2
D. Law,6 E. Mörtsell,1 R. Quimby,7,8 N. Blagorodnova,2 A. Brandeker,9 Y. Cao,10
A. Cooray,11 R. Ferretti,1 C. Fremling,12 L. Hangard,1 M. Kasliwal,2 T. Kupfer,2
R. Lunnan,2,9 F. Masci,13 A. A. Miller,14,15 H. Nayyeri,11 J. D. Neill,2 E. O. Ofek,5
S. Papadogiannakis,1 T. Petrushevska,1 V. Ravi,2 J. Sollerman,12 M. Sullivan,16
F. Taddia,12 R. Walters,2 D. Wilson,11 L. Yan,2 O. Yaron5
We report the discovery of a multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed type Ia supernova,
iPTF16geu (SN 2016geu), at redshift z = 0.409. This phenomenon was identified because
the light from the stellar explosion was magnified more than 50 times by the curvature of
space around matter in an intervening galaxy. We used high-spatial-resolution observations
to resolve four images of the lensed supernova, approximately 0.3 arc seconds from the
center of the foreground galaxy. The observations probe a physical scale of ~1 kiloparsec,
smaller than is typical in other studies of extragalactic gravitational lensing. The large
magnification and symmetric image configuration imply close alignment between the lines
of sight to the supernova and to the lens. The relative magnifications of the four images
provide evidence for substructures in the lensing galaxy.
One of the foundations of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity is that matter curves the surrounding space-time. For the rare cases of nearly perfect alignment of an astronomical source, an intervening massive object, and the observer, multiple images of
a single source can be detected—a phenomenon
known as strong gravitational lensing.
Although many strongly lensed galaxies and
quasars have been detected to date, it has proved
extremely difficult to find multiply imaged lensed
supernova (SN) explosions. Type Ia supernovae
(SNe Ia) are particularly interesting sources be-
cause of their “standard-candle” nature. These
explosions have nearly identical peak luminosity,
which makes them excellent distance indicators
in cosmology (1). For lensed SNe Ia, the standard-
candle property allows the flux magnification to
be estimated directly, independent of any model
related to the lensing galaxy (2, 3). This removes
two important degeneracies in gravitational lens-
ing measurements: the mass-sheet degeneracy (4)
and the source-plane degeneracy (5).
PS1-10afx, a lensed SN Ia at redshift z = 1.388
with a large amplification (m 30) where multiple
images could have been expected, was reported
several years ago (6 ). A foreground lens was later
identified at z = 1.117 (7). At the time of the discovery, several interpretations were discussed, including a superluminous supernova (8). Because
the lensed SN Ia hypothesis did not gain acceptance until long after the explosion had faded, no
high-spatial-resolution imaging could be carried
out in that case to verify the strong lensing nature of the system. Multiple images of another
supernova, SN Refsdal (9), were discovered in a
Hubble Space Telescope (HST) survey of the
massive galaxy cluster MACS J1149.6+2223. As the
source was identified as a core-collapse supernova, it could not be used to measure the lensing
Thanks to the well-known characteristics of
their time-dependent brightness in optical and
near-infrared (NIR) filters (the SN light curves),
1Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm
University, Albanova University Center, SE 106 91 Stockholm,
Sweden. 2Cahill Center for Astrophysics, California Institute
of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. 3Department of
Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
4MS 50B-4206, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. 5Department of Particle Physics and
Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001,
Israel. 6Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218,
USA. 7Department of Astronomy, San Diego State University,
San Diego, CA 92182, USA. 8Kavli IPMU (WPI), University of
Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583,
Japan. 9Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University,
Albanova, SE 10691 Stockholm, Sweden. 10eScience Institute
and Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle,
WA 98195, USA. 11Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. 12Oskar Klein
Centre, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University,
Albanova University Center, SE 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
13Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute
of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. 14Center for
Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics and
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University,
Evanston, IL 60208, USA. 15Adler Planetarium, Chicago, IL
60605, USA. 16Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
*Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org